Re: Make query cancellation keys longer

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Make query cancellation keys longer
Date: 2025-04-03 11:33:13
Message-ID: faa323e3-f2f3-459a-984a-d118e9c765d3@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/04/2025 14:29, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 2 Apr 2025, at 15:48, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
>> And committed, with minor a bunch more little cleanups.
>
> 0001 in commit 09be39112654 seems to have missed (omitted?) adding the HAVE_
> macros to pg_config.h.in, which doesn't matter as of now since they're not used
> but it will be in the way for anyone running autoheader. Any objection to me
> pushing the attached?

Sounds good, thanks!

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2025-04-03 11:34:02 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2025-04-03 11:30:08 Re: two occurrences of assign print_notnull within pg_dump.c