From: | "Andy Dale" <andy(dot)dale(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de" <mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia |
Date: | 2007-08-02 12:34:40 |
Message-ID: | faa313130708020534p5ba30030l9d206340aef9a11f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I have some experience with HA-JDBC and on the whole it is pretty good (very
easy to setup), with it's only sight weakness being it synchronisation
(renders the DB read only) but this is to be improved in the future. I
have tried to setup sequioa but it is pretty complex (and more heavyweight
than ha-jdbc), and i never quite managed to get it working exactly as i
wanted it to.
Cheers,
Andy
On 02/08/07, mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de <mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 2. August 2007 12:04 schrieb Andy Dale:
> > Hi,
> >
> > You might also want to check out HA-JDBC at
> http://ha-jdbc.sourceforge.net
>
> thanks for this suggestion, so i have three options to choose from:
>
> - pgpool2
> - sequoia
> - ha-jdbc
>
> Can someone share his experience on these?
>
> kind regards
> janning
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Knudsen | 2007-08-02 12:35:30 | Restrict access |
Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2007-08-02 12:19:12 | Re: file-system snapshot under freebsd for backup |