From: | "Andy Dale" <andy(dot)dale(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de" <mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia |
Date: | 2007-08-02 10:04:11 |
Message-ID: | faa313130708020304y1a375839jf774bee0bb05a8c7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
You might also want to check out HA-JDBC at http://ha-jdbc.sourceforge.net
Cheers,
Andy
On 02/08/07, mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de <mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i would like to use a statement replication for postgresql
>
> i have found the following solutions:
> - pgpool
> - pgpool2
> - sequoia (jdbc, formerly known as c-jdbc)
>
> pgpool has only two nodes, so this is not an option.
>
> I will never change my underlying database, of course :-)
> So i dont have any advantage of the sequoia jdbc abstraction. i'd rather
> sometimes use other tools than jdbc to access the database with some perl
> scripts, so this is an advantage for pgpool2. but sequoia looks very nice
> at
> first glance.
>
> What are other advantages/disadvantages in respect of
> - performance/scalability
> - stability
> - support / ease-of-use / etc.
>
> i would be very happy if someone can share his/her expierence with such a
> solution.
>
> kind regards,
> janning
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mljv | 2007-08-02 11:35:18 | Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia |
Previous Message | mljv | 2007-08-02 09:58:40 | pgpool2 vs sequoia |