From: | Vitaly Belman <vitalyb(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Fwd: [NOVICE] Autocommit in Postgresql |
Date: | 2005-05-12 14:46:35 |
Message-ID: | fa96e3c605051207463d63f71b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support pgsql-novice |
Anyone has an idea? On the subject?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Date: May 12, 2005 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Autocommit in Postgresql
To: Vitaly Belman <vitalyb(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Olivier Thauvin <olivier(dot)thauvin(at)aerov(dot)jussieu(dot)fr>, Postgresql
Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Vitaly Belman <vitalyb(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> That's the problem... Is there a way to make it implicitly open a
> transaction? For example now in pgAdmin when I play with SQLs I have
> to do begin and rollback constant because whenever a query fails it
> refuses to do anything at all until I "rollback", and then of course I
> have to do "begin" again unless I want my queries to be real.
pgAdmin really should offer some kind of setting to help you with that.
Try asking the pgadmin gurus (I am not sure if any of them read this
list).
regards, tom lane
--
ICQ: 1912453
AIM: VitalyB1984
MSN: tmdagent(at)hotmail(dot)com
Yahoo!: VitalyBe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-05-12 15:25:01 | Re: Fwd: [NOVICE] Autocommit in Postgresql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-12 14:43:00 | Re: Autocommit in Postgresql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-05-12 15:14:38 | Re: Using PgSQL in high volume and throughput problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-12 14:43:00 | Re: Autocommit in Postgresql |