From: | "Satoshi Nagayasu" <snaga(at)snaga(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, "Tatsuo Ishii" <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Change the name |
Date: | 2007-09-25 15:25:45 |
Message-ID: | fa3bffeb0709250825x6dfaf268p41cf9f93696a3c39@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Hi all,
I apologize that I don't read all messages in this thread,
but I can give some comments from the Japanese users' view.
I don't see the benefit of changing the name, so I don't
have any reason to change the name right now.
In Japan, many people pronounce 'Post-gres' or 'Pos-gre',
but such ambiguous pronunciation is not a serious problem
for us (PostgreSQL community). In fact, PostgreSQL has
many users and large market-share in Japan.
I'm working in Japanese PostgreSQL community, writing
PostgreSQL articles for DBAs in magazine, planning/holding
the PostgreSQL user conference (Josh was comming),
and discussing with many users and developers.
According to my experience, to boost our market-share,
we (PostgreSQL community) have to write more techdocs
(for DBAs), share our case studies (best practices),
and write/port more applications which support PostgreSQL.
There is no silver bullet.
Changing the name is not a silver bullet.
Just my opinion.
Do you really think that changing the name could benefit/help
the PostgreSQL users/developers?
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <snaga(at)snaga(dot)org>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Wang | 2007-09-26 05:58:10 | Re: Change the name |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-09-25 09:26:29 | Re: Change the name |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Wang | 2007-09-26 05:58:10 | Re: Change the name |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-09-25 09:26:29 | Re: Change the name |