Re: PL/java

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/java
Date: 2020-12-07 16:32:57
Message-ID: fa245ee6-4f34-dce8-e5f1-a764b0eaae30@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/7/20 8:16 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>
> On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
>>> I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like
>>> Java is not meant to interact with databases.
>>
>> The JDBC folks might disagree.
>>
> That interaction is strictly sql to db, data to app.  As it should be.

Playing Devil's advocate. It is still Java interacting with a database.
The objection I gather is to having Java embedded in the database. SQL
interaction is no panacea:

https://portswigger.net/daily-swig/sql-injection

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message github kran 2020-12-07 16:35:24 PostgreSQL Database Upgrade
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2020-12-07 16:16:20 Re: PL/java