From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: transactional DDL |
Date: | 2007-08-15 06:03:25 |
Message-ID: | f9u500$2253$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Greg Smith wrote:
> There is now is a discussion of the benefits of PostgreSQL's
> transactional DDL abilities on the otherwise deprecated page at
Somewhat related ALTER TABLE in MySQL is actually a copy+drop, which
obviously is quite costly and time consuming. This is why they can offer
the convenience of allowing you to decide where to place a column in an
existing table. This in turn is something that ActiveRecord
implementations love, because they default to using the column order in
their view presentation. Which means a lot of people perceive this as a
missing feature in PostgreSQL.
regards,
Lukas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-08-15 12:08:02 | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-08-15 05:18:31 | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brian Gough | 2007-08-15 08:44:20 | Re: Printed Doc |
Previous Message | Josh Tolley | 2007-08-15 03:10:14 | Re: L |