From: | Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. |
Date: | 2005-04-22 15:53:30 |
Message-ID: | f96a9b830504220853670bf7cd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/22/05, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Fetching data from just indexes has been discussed on this list several
> times before, and it has been told that this can't be done with postgres
> thanks to MVCC.
>
> But this is true only when data is changing. In a data-warehousing
> scenario what it is often needed is a possibility for fast querying of
> static historical data.
>
> If table has been VACUUM'ed or REINDEX'ed after last change
> (update/delete/insert), then there is 1-1 correspondence between table
> and indexes, and thus no need to fetch the tuple from heap for extra
> visibility checks.
>
> What I am proposing is
>
> 1) possibility to explicitly change table status to READ-ONLY .
>
> 2) setting a flag CAN_OMIT_HEAP_CHECK after REINDEX TABLE for tables
> that are READ-ONLY
Why stop at indexes? If you switch to readonly status with a CLUSTER
or ALTER TABLE command you can even remove the visibility information
from the heap tuples. Visibility would be exclusively controlled by
the visibility of the table in the catalog, i.e. all or nothing.
Jochem
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-04-22 15:53:49 | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords |
Previous Message | Dave Held | 2005-04-22 15:44:55 | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) |