From: | Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns |
Date: | 2004-07-02 17:50:08 |
Message-ID: | f96a9b8304070210502c42da29@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 14:57:18 +0300, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> wrote:
>
> IIRC we were recently told (in this thread) that the SQL standard tells
> to end local customisations with underscore, so it would be
> 'column_comment_'
I didn't write that (or at least, I didn't mean to write that :-). The
SQL standard tells that they will not use trailing underscores,
therefore *my* conclusion is that it is future proof (from a standards
perspective) if all PostgreSQL extensions use a trailing underscore.
Which also gives an indication to the user that it is a PostgreSQL
extension.
"NOTE 77 - It is the intention that no <key word> specified in ISO/IEC
9075 or revisions thereto shall end with an <underscore>."
ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003 5.4 Names and Identifiers
Jochem
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-07-02 18:37:46 | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-02 17:24:00 | Re: Subtle bug in clog.c |