Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Sergei Agalakov <sergei(dot)agalakov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs
Date: 2019-01-20 19:31:49
Message-ID: f95ff490-672b-032c-6876-2e83661b93bb@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi John,

On 1/16/19 10:08 PM, John Naylor wrote:
>> [v5]
>
> Hi Tomas,
> Peter suggested upthread to use 'settings' rather than 'gucs' for the
> explain option (and output?), and you seemed to agree. Are you going
> to include that in a future version? Speaking of the output, v5's
> default text doesn't match that of formatted text ('GUCs' / 'GUC').
>

Attached is v6 of the patch, adopting "settings" instead of "guc".

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
explain-with-gucs-v6.patch text/x-patch 27.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-20 19:37:43 Re: A small note on the portability of cmake
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-01-20 19:31:08 Re: A small note on the portability of cmake