Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Date: 2019-02-07 08:31:56
Message-ID: f9079be8-323b-6b17-86b8-9fa00d3c15b0@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/02/2019 23:02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Some things from this thread were left for post-11; see attached patch.
>
> Specifically, this changes pg_dump and ruleutils.c to use the FUNCTION
> keyword instead of PROCEDURE in trigger and event trigger definitions,
> which was postponed because of the required catversion bump.

done

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arseny Sher 2019-02-07 08:50:29 Re: Too rigorous assert in reorderbuffer.c
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-02-07 08:30:38 restrict pg_stat_ssl to superuser?