On 08/08/2019 16.38, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Given that both of these troublesome schemas have dashes in their
>> names, the most obvious theory is that clone_schema() has some
>> oversight about double-quoting schema names everywhere necessary.
> According to this implementation
> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANu8FiyJtt-0q%3DbkUxyra66tHi6FFzgU8TqVR2aahseCBDDntA%40mail.gmail.com>
> the first query is performed with quote_ident and that's the initial
> failure. However, the original post claimed it has been converted from
> a function to a procedure, so it could be the quote_ident part has
> been removed.
> What is the source of clone_schema?
The clone_schema is the one from the above quoted post, i.e. the last
version by Melvin Davidson. Although it has been converted to a
procedure, the code itself has not been changed. If you wish, I could
attach it but the "$BODY$" block is identical to the original.
> Luca
>
>
>
Thank you for your responses!