| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Interval for launching the table sync worker |
| Date: | 2017-04-27 19:33:37 |
| Message-ID: | f8b4b73e-31b8-f4e0-52b8-cea061e4cf2c@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27/04/17 21:00, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/27/17 06:47, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> One thing I am missing in your patch however is cleanup of entries for
>> relations that finished sync. I wonder if it would be enough to just
>> destroy the hash when we get to empty list.
>
> I had omitted that because the amount of memory "leaked" is not much,
> but I guess it wouldn't hurt to clean it up.
>
> How about the attached?
>
Yes that's more or less what I meant. All good.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rahila Syed | 2017-04-27 19:41:21 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
| Previous Message | Sven R. Kunze | 2017-04-27 19:15:30 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |