| From: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f |
| Date: | 2025-02-11 20:19:28 |
| Message-ID: | f8828755-82dd-4915-a64d-25bfd0dfa549@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/2/2025 00:41, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:14 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Moreover, switching to a floating-point type for row explanations in
>> each parameterised node would provide a more comprehensive view and add
>> valuable information about the parameterisation of the node, which may
>> not be immediately apparent.
>
> I agree strongly with all of this. I believe we should just implement
> what was agreed here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21013.1243618236%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> Let's just display 2 fractional digits when nloops>1, else 0, and call it good.
Why are there only two fractional digits?
I reviewed the user reports where we identified issues without
sufficient data, based on explains only, and typical examples included
loop numbers ranging from 1E5 to 1E7 and tuples from 1E2 to 1E5.
Therefore, it may make sense to display fractional digits up to two
meaningful (non-zero) digits.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-11 20:25:00 | Re: PATCH: Disallow a netmask of zero unless the IP is also all zeroes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-11 20:18:40 | Re: Bump soft open file limit (RLIMIT_NOFILE) to hard limit on startup |