From: | lbrtchx(at)hotmail(dot)com (Albretch) |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)pgsql-hackers"(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2004-06-07 10:34:58 |
Message-ID: | f8544ad2.0406070234.20411673@posting.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> wrote in message news:<40C365E0(dot)6090905(at)bigfoot(dot)com>...
> If you access a table more frequently then other and you have enough
> RAM your OS will mantain that table on RAM, don't you think ?
> BTW if you trust on your UPS I'm sure you are able to create a RAM
> disk and place that table in RAM.
>
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
RAMdisks still need a hard disk drive to operate. I am talking here
about entirely diskless configurations.
Well, maybe as I suspected there is no technical explanation why this
design decision has been made.
When I have more time I will run a bechmark to check to which extent
it does make a difference. I mean running the application from RAM and
letting the DBMS know about it instead of letting the OS figure it
out.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-06-07 10:39:53 | Re: Backup and Restore of PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Michal Hlavac | 2004-06-07 09:46:07 | Re: pg_dump and tsearch2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-06-07 10:56:54 | Failures with windows port |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-06-07 09:25:35 | Re: Postres dilemma |