From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: simplify regular expression locale global variables |
Date: | 2024-10-15 13:27:46 |
Message-ID: | f842b6f8-a46f-4ae1-8bff-a6d79e560478@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.10.24 12:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-Oct-15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> @@ -253,8 +241,9 @@ pg_set_regex_collation(Oid collation)
>> * catalog access is available, so we can't call
>> * pg_newlocale_from_collation().
>> */
>> + static struct pg_locale_struct dummy_locale = {.ctype_is_c = true};
>> +
>> + locale = &dummy_locale;
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> @@ -264,121 +253,80 @@ pg_set_regex_collation(Oid collation)
>> ereport(ERROR,
>> (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
>> errmsg("nondeterministic collations are not supported for regular expressions")));
>> [...]
>> }
>>
>> pg_regex_locale = locale;
>> }
>
> Hmm, is it valid to make pg_regex_locale point to a function-local
> static here? The lifetime of this static is not clear to me, and I
> think this pattern works with at least some compilers, but I remember
> comments on previous patch review threads that this pattern isn't
> kosher.
I think this must be okay. Some classic non-thread-safe C library
functions essentially work that way, e.g.,
char *strerror(int errnum)
{
static char buf[...];
strcpy(buf, ....);
return buf;
}
and then you can use the return pointer wherever you want.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Kuznetsov | 2024-10-15 14:09:42 | Re: Check for tuplestorestate nullness before dereferencing |
Previous Message | jian he | 2024-10-15 13:22:53 | Re: Set query_id for query contained in utility statement |