From: | "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Wiki CSS |
Date: | 2008-09-10 00:36:20 |
Message-ID: | f7f6b4c70809091736n1f39aef2rf9acdd2936330739@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Greg,
( I believe that... )
You may avoid that caching by adding an expire date to the css http
header so the browser will be forzed to perform the download.
2 cents.
Gb.
2008/9/9, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, David Fetter wrote:
>
>> The standard doesn't number them the way you're doing, and I need to be
>> able to override it. Just to clarify, if somebody doesn't use actual
>> HTML and the given classes for <li> tags, nothing will change.
>
> I'm not familiar enough with CSS to say whether that's true or not. I do
> suspect there was a way to accomplish this for a page without touching
> common.css like that. I would have certainly asked that question here and
> waited a while for feedback before touching anything.
>
> What I am uncomfortable with is the way this page was edited. The
> common.css file is cached by browsers for a long time. See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Catalogue_of_CSS_classes for
> comments about that. Looks like it was about three hours you experimented
> there to get that right. It really bothers me that changes that impact
> the whole site were made like that. Someone who happened to grab one of
> your intermediate files during that period is stuck with that one for the
> next month unless they know the proper reload trick. What if you'd have
> accidentally broken something?
>
> I personally would never touch common.css with an untested change on this
> Wiki. I have a private MediaWiki installation I use for experiments like
> that, and I'd only roll out a system-wide change on the PG Wiki that had
> been confirmed to work there first. In this case, I don't think you
> actually did any harm, but the way this all happened is not something I'd
> like to see repeated.
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>
--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-10 00:37:04 | Re: Wiki CSS |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-09-09 23:42:15 | Re: Wiki CSS |