From: | "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
Date: | 2008-09-09 18:02:06 |
Message-ID: | f7f6b4c70809091102p1b490afofe3d4acb9cc33529@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Joshua,
*... a surprise to me* ---> Though *compile* would beat other methods.
gb.-
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:42:51 -0700
> "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Binary package from www.postgresql.org 121 33.799%
>> Through operating system update tool 127 35.475%
>> ~66%
>>
>> Compile from source 98 27.374%
>>
>> Hmmm, are we doing something with this information? I am not an expert
>> at all, but I reccon that these numbers are at least a surprise to me.
>>
>
> Why is it a surprise?
>
> --
> The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
> United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
>
--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-09 18:06:19 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-09 17:56:00 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-09 18:06:19 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-09 17:56:00 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |