Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date: 2018-08-17 18:48:49
Message-ID: f7a207c9-b756-11b5-cada-9a59dffe6dd1@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 08/17/2018 08:24 PM, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
>> BTW how did we end up with the regression differences? Presumably you've
>> tried that on your machine and it passed. So if we adjust the expected
>> file, won't it fail on some other machines?
>
> I had another patch to check for -0 inside float{4,8}_{div,mul}(). I
> dropped it on the last set of patches, so the tests were broken. I
> get -0 as a result of -x * 0 both on Mac and Linux.
>

OK, that explains is. I won't have time to get this committed before CF
2018-09, but I'll pick it up in September.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-08-17 18:55:03 Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-17 18:32:59 Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c