From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add id's to various elements in protocol.sgml |
Date: | 2021-12-17 07:13:51 |
Message-ID: | f73c1f87-3e9f-06b0-7c1d-3d253dfdb6cd@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.12.21 16:59, Brar Piening wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2021 at 15:49, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2021-Dec-15, Brar Piening wrote:
>>> Since I can't argue towards some general utility for the xreflabels
>>> and don't have any other solid argument in favor of adding more, I
>>> will remove them from my current patch but leave the existing ones
>>> intact.
>> Yeah, I think not adding them until we have a use for them might be
>> wisest.
> A new version of the patch that doesn't add xreflabels is attached.
Now this patch adds a bunch of ids, but you can't use them to link to,
because as soon as you do, you will get complaints about a missing
xreflabel. So what is the remaining purpose?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shruthi Gowda | 2021-12-17 07:33:06 | Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-12-17 07:03:33 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |