Re: I could not get postgres to utilizy indexes

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: "Leeuw van der, Tim" <tim(dot)leeuwvander(at)nl(dot)unisys(dot)com>
Cc: "Igor Artimenko" <iartimenko(at)bluecatnetworks(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: I could not get postgres to utilizy indexes
Date: 2004-08-20 13:37:40
Message-ID: f6ubi0dohklmqdmktbh3vhm8t8i42sr5ps@email.aon.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:54:47 +0200, "Leeuw van der, Tim"
<tim(dot)leeuwvander(at)nl(dot)unisys(dot)com> wrote:
>You asked the very same question yesterday, and I believe you got some useful answers. Why do you post the question again?

Tim, no need to be rude here. We see this effect from time to time when
a new user sends a message to a mailing list while not subscribed. The
sender gets an automated reply from majordomo, subscribes to the list
and sends his mail again. One or two days later the original message is
approved (by Marc, AFAIK) and forwarded to the list. Look at the
timestamps in these header lines:
|Received: from postgresql.org (svr1.postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
| by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B1F5B04F4;
| Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:54:13 +0000 (GMT)
|Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
| by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B2B5E4701
| for <pgsql-performance-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:23:07 -0300 (ADT)

>[more instructions]

And while we are teaching netiquette, could you please stop top-posting
and full-quoting.

Igor, welcome to the list! Did the suggestions you got solve your
problem?

Servus
Manfred

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Leeuw van der, Tim 2004-08-20 13:45:05 Re: I could not get postgres to utilizy indexes
Previous Message Bonnin S. 2004-08-20 12:59:08 pg_restore very slow in 8.0.0beta1