Re: Replication/backup defaults

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Replication/backup defaults
Date: 2017-01-07 00:27:38
Message-ID: f60a7fd6-781c-1227-6b5b-8927432bca69@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/5/17 12:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-01-05 08:38:32 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I also suggest making the defaults for both 20 instead of 10. That
>> leaves enough room that almost nobody ever has to change them, whereas
>> 10 can be a bit tight for some not-outrageous installations (8 standbys
>> plus backup?).
>
> I'm afraid we need to add initdb integration / testing for those. I mean
> we have initdb test down to 10 connections to deal with limited
> resources...

Those initdb defaults were last touched in 2005, before the use of
System V shared memory was reduced to a minimum. It might be worth
revisiting that. The only way to end up with a low number of connection
slots would seem to be a very low semaphore configuration.

In the build farm, I have found 6 critters that do not end up with the
100/128MB setting: sidewinder, curculio, coypu, brolga, lorikeet,
opossum. I wonder what limitations initdb is bumping against.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-07 00:29:22 Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-06 23:58:17 Re: Replication/backup defaults