Re: Delete rules and functions

From: Wiebe Cazemier <halfgaar(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Delete rules and functions
Date: 2007-06-26 21:37:11
Message-ID: f5s0u7$kiv$1@sea.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Tuesday 26 June 2007 22:50, Tom Lane wrote:

> Please provide an example, because the rewriter is most certainly
> applied to queries from functions.
>
> I suspect you are actually being burnt by some other effect, like a row
> disappearing from the view as soon as its underlying data is deleted.

Here is an example (and it's nothing more than an example...):

--------------

CREATE TABLE cars
(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
);

--------------

CREATE TABLE car_parts
(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
car_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES cars ON DELETE CASCADE,
steering_wheel_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES steering_wheels
);

--------------

CREATE RULE AS ON DELETE TO car_parts DO ALSO
(
DELETE FROM steering_wheels WHERE id = OLD.steering_wheel_id;
);

--------------

CREATE VIEW cars_view AS SELECT * FROM cars;

--------------

CREATE FUNCTION cars_delete(p_old) RETURNS VOID AS $$
BEGIN
DELETE FROM cars where id = p_old.id;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

--------------

CREATE RULE AS ON DELETE TO cars_view DO INSTEAD
(
SELECT cars_delete();
);

--------------

Now, when I delete a row from the cars_view, the underlying record from car is
deleted, which cascades to car_parts. The rule intended for removing the
steering wheel doesn't do anything.

And now that I wrote it, I can see that it's indeed because OLD no longer
exists. I knew this was the case for rules, but I overlooked it, apparently...

I had already converted it to use triggers, and I'll leave it that way.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Landin Hostbaek 2007-06-27 08:12:59 Re: Where clause
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-26 20:50:12 Re: Delete rules and functions