| From: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode |
| Date: | 2016-02-22 07:45:37 |
| Message-ID: | f5b058472624a03ad5f7228e5eb22266@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>> - All the core routines used should be compatible down to perl 5.8.8.
>>
>
> Ugh. So not just Perl, ancient perl.
>
> I don't suppose Perl offers any kind of "compatible(5.8.8)" statement
> or
> anything? Do I have to compile a ten-year-old Perl and its dependencies
> to
> work on PostgreSQL tests?
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-MinimumVersion/lib/Perl/MinimumVersion.pm
> looks useful; do you think it's reasonable for code that passes that
> check
> to just be thrown at the buildfarm?
I think what's needed is:
use 5.008_008;
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2016-02-22 07:50:41 | Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-02-22 07:41:51 | Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode |