| From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump of partitioned table not working. |
| Date: | 2020-12-03 00:36:00 |
| Message-ID: | f57cc88f-50bb-e5bb-5f9d-8a25b2008eb9@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/2/20 6:21 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:14 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> > It does seem like there might be reason to have a switch along
> > the lines of "--include-child-tables".
>
> That would be great, but won't help me in v12.
>
>
> I'd probably just relocate the table to a separate schema and require that
> all partitions are placed there as well. Otherwise, the necessary
> information exists in the catalogs, so a solution is within reach (minor
> concern regarding concurrency).
That's doable, but the developer (of the very large mission-critical
*existing application*) would probably push back.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2020-12-03 00:38:14 | Re: pg_dump of partitioned table not working. |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-12-03 00:21:34 | Re: pg_dump of partitioned table not working. |