From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: assorted code cleanup |
Date: | 2017-09-05 19:12:41 |
Message-ID: | f52c16db-14ed-757d-4b48-7ef360b1631d@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/21/17 01:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> - Drop excessive dereferencing of function pointers
>
> - (*next_ProcessUtility_hook) (pstmt, queryString,
> + next_ProcessUtility_hook(pstmt, queryString,
> context, params, queryEnv,
> dest, completionTag);
> But this... Personally I like the current grammar which allows one to
> make the difference between a function call with something declared
> locally and something that may be going to a custom code path. So I
> think that you had better not update the system hooks that external
> modules can use via shared_preload_libraries.
Do you mean specifically the hook variables, or any function pointers?
I can see your point in the above case, but for example here
- if ((*tinfo->f_lt) (o.upper, c.upper, flinfo))
+ if (tinfo->f_lt(o.upper, c.upper, flinfo))
I think there is no loss of clarity and the extra punctuation makes it
more complicated to read.
>> - Remove unnecessary parentheses in return statements
>
> So you would still keep parenthesis like here for simple expressions:
> contrib/bloom/blutils.c: return (x - 1);
> No objections.
>
> Here are some more:
> contrib/intarray/_int_bool.c: return (calcnot) ?
> contrib/ltree/ltxtquery_op.c: return (calcnot) ?
>
> And there are many "(0)" "S_ANYTHING" in src/interfaces/ecpg/test/ and
> src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/.
Thanks, I included these.
>> - Remove our own definition of NULL
>
> Fine. c.h uses once NULL before enforcing its definition.
Actually, that would have worked fine, because the earlier use is a
macro definition, so NULL would not have been needed until it is used.
>> - fuzzystrmatch: Remove dead code
>
> Those are remnants of a323ede, which missed to removed everything.
Good reference, makes sense.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-05 19:32:27 | Re: assorted code cleanup |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-09-05 19:08:50 | Re: assorted code cleanup |