| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
| Date: | 2021-11-17 21:10:20 |
| Message-ID: | f50c2f2657cc801914e8df190df15f05c6a25cf3.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 10:48 -0800, Mark Dilger wrote:
> GRANT *might* be part of some solution, but it is unclear to me how
> best to do it. The various configuration parameters on subscriptions
> entail different security concerns. We might take a fine-grained
> approach and create a predefined role for each
I think you misunderstood the idea: not using predefined roles, just
plain old ordinary GRANT on a subscription object to ordinary roles.
GRANT REFRESH ON SUBSCRIPTION sub1 TO nonsuper;
This should be easy enough because the subscription is a real object,
right?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lars Kanis | 2021-11-17 21:13:33 | Windows: Wrong error message at connection termination |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-11-17 21:06:32 | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |