Re: Typo in description of replay_lag attribute in pg_stat_replication view

From: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Typo in description of replay_lag attribute in pg_stat_replication view
Date: 2018-12-05 07:52:27
Message-ID: f4d5982d-5bbe-d8bd-9e99-829e5c31ed40@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

05.12.2018 4:04, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 01:24:22AM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
>> Yeah, I think the notion *remote_flush level* is more appropriate especially
>> in the context of sync replication. Within this context maybe it makes sense
>> to replace the word *level* to *value* in description of *flush_lag*?
> I am not sure that this is an improvement. Anyway, I have committed
> your original patch as that's clearly a mistake and back-patched down to
> v10.

Ok, thanks.

--
Regards,
Maksim Milyutin

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavlo Golub 2018-12-05 15:14:16 Re: Updating the intro for packages - improve usability, reduce new user confusion
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-05 01:04:55 Re: Typo in description of replay_lag attribute in pg_stat_replication view