Re: Resume vacuum and autovacuum from interruption and cancellation

From: btkimurayuzk <btkimurayuzk(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Resume vacuum and autovacuum from interruption and cancellation
Date: 2019-11-07 09:09:00
Message-ID: f41cd5e0a8c4e50033193c689fdc4e35@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


+ VACOPT_RESUME = 1 << 8 /* resume from the previous point */

I think this unused ENUM value is not needed.

Regards,

Yu Kimura

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-11-07 09:09:33 Re: alternative to PG_CATCH
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-11-07 09:01:34 Re: Add SQL function to show total block numbers in the relation