Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date: 2020-06-05 15:02:45
Message-ID: f3fe46fe-f45d-1fb2-83be-fba70fe00cdd@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/6/20 5:19 μ.μ., Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Achilleas Mantzios schrieb am 05.06.2020 um 14:05:
>>> Plus PG does not directly support cross database queries using 3 part name, something
>>> sqlserver excels at.
>> Maybe because SQL server does not have real databases but schemas instead ?
>> This sucks security wise.
> That is wrong.
>
> SQL Server has both: databases and schemas and it allows for standard compliant catalog.schema.table references.
>
> I think you are confusing that with MySQL where a schema and a database are the same thing
I think that you are confusing what you think I am confusing. I am talking about our MS SQL installation here at work. Not done by me anyways I am the pgsql guy, but still do most of the query stuff
in ms sql as well.
I wrote already that my comment was far fetched in a subsequent email.
>
>

--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter J. Holzer 2020-06-05 15:30:57 Re: Binary encoding of TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-06-05 14:31:37 Re: Possible improvement