Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-01-30 13:23:05
Message-ID: f3d13e2d-e6a0-0af3-d2bd-1109ee559284@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amit,

On 01/29/2018 07:57 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> This needs a rebase.
>
> AFAICS, v22 cleanly applies to HEAD (c12693d8f3 [1]), compiles, and make
> check passes.
>

It was a rebase error; I should have checked against a clean master.

Sorry for the noise.

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-01-30 13:59:35 Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-01-30 11:43:57 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning