Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Date: 2018-05-01 11:50:04
Message-ID: f3a05791-1bee-95ae-6221-85323495ba31@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/26/18 05:03, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/04/26 13:01, David Rowley wrote:
>> The attached small patch removes the mention that partitioned tables
>> cannot have foreign keys defined on them.
>>
>> This has been supported since 3de241db
>
> I noticed also that the item regarding row triggers might be obsolete as
> of 86f575948c7, thanks again to Alvaro! So, I updated your patch to take
> care of that.

committed both

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-05-01 12:10:00 Re: Is there a memory leak in commit 8561e48?
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-05-01 11:30:07 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.