Re: BUG #16970: pgrouting_11-3.1.3-1.rhel8.x86_64.rpm is not signed

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: jason(dot)blennerhassett(at)thalesgroup(dot)com(dot)au, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16970: pgrouting_11-3.1.3-1.rhel8.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Date: 2021-04-19 13:27:30
Message-ID: f36c77ec635b4c7369d69b4d6591e733e5e2ea37.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


Hi,

On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 02:45 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference:      16970
> Logged by:          Jason Blennerhassett
> Email address:      jason(dot)blennerhassett(at)thalesgroup(dot)com(dot)au
> PostgreSQL version: 13.2
> Operating system:   NA
> Description:       
>
> Hi team
>
> The latest package for pgrouting_11 (pgrouting_11-3.1.3-
> 1.rhel8.x86_64.rpm)
> has not been signed - this is hosted in your repo here:
> https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/11/redhat/rhel-8-x86_64/
>
> Can I request this package be re signed / re version'd with
> appropriate
> signature? Thanks

Sorry for the inconvenience. Fixed. The updated packages will appear in
next 1 hour.

Regards,

--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-04-19 15:57:25 Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2021-04-19 02:45:02 BUG #16970: pgrouting_11-3.1.3-1.rhel8.x86_64.rpm is not signed