Re: lifetime of the old CTID

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Matthias Apitz <guru(at)unixarea(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: lifetime of the old CTID
Date: 2022-07-05 16:19:18
Message-ID: f363b79595205d42764ad7485aa46ab534f2d318.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 17:52 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día martes, julio 05, 2022 a las 04:17:41p. m. +0200, Laurenz Albe escribió:
>
> > > > Another explanation could be that the HOT chain was pruned while you were away.
> > >
> > > I've read now about HOT and understand that autovacuum will prune the
> > > HOT chain. But also a simple SELECT seems to remove it:
> > >
> > > sisis=# SELECT currtid2('d01buch'::text, '(29036,11)'::tid);
> > >  currtid2 
> > > -----------
> > >  (29036,7)
> > >
> > >
> > > sisis=# select ctid, d01gsi from d01buch where d01gsi = '0240564';
> > >    ctid    |           d01gsi           
> > > -----------+-----------------------------
> > >  (29036,7) | 0240564                   
> > >
> > >
> > > sisis=# SELECT currtid2('d01buch'::text, '(29036,11)'::tid);
> > >   currtid2 
> > > ------------
> > >  (29036,11)
> >
> > Right.  Heap-Only tuples can also vanish without autovacuum; that is why I
> > suspected it might have been that.
>
> Hi Laurenz, ist there any way to keep/freeze such tuples until the run
> of the next autovaccum? Some kind of config value in 13.x or 14.x? Or
> even a code change for this? We compile on Linux from the sources and
> have already some code changes in place...

That should be possible, but why do you want that? Perhaps there is a better
solution for your problem.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shashidhar Reddy 2022-07-05 16:54:30 How to upgrade postgres version 8 to 13
Previous Message Matthias Apitz 2022-07-05 15:52:04 Re: lifetime of the old CTID