Re: Future Non-server Windows support???

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Bill Haught <wlhaught4754323(at)att(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Future Non-server Windows support???
Date: 2019-03-07 21:06:00
Message-ID: f325e759-78d0-dae3-5823-08e33dd84ade@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/7/19 12:58 PM, Bill Haught wrote:
> On 3/7/2019 8:29 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>> Bill Haught schrieb am 07.03.2019 um 20:41:
>>> "...most Windows 95 applications still run fine in Windows 10 -
>>> that's 20 years of binary compatibility"  See Major Linux Problems on
>>> the Desktop, 2018 edition by Artem S. Tashkinov
>>> https://itvision.altervista.org/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html
>>>
>>>
>>> I really wish Linux or Linux plus Darling was a real alternative to
>>> Winblows.
>>
>> On the server, Linux definitely *is* a real alternative to Windows
>>
>>
>> My 0.02€
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> In the case of servers, I thought it was the other way around.  Last I
> heard they were neck-and-neck after Linux being overwhelmingly in the
> lead for at least something like the first decade of the (at least
> "public") Internet.

See:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-now-dominates-azure/

>
> Like why would anyone choose Winbloz *if* you don't *have* too, I have
> no idea.
>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-07 21:06:53 Re: Property Graph Query Language proposed for SQL:2020
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-07 21:04:35 Re: python install location