From: | Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multiple semicolon separated statements and autocommit |
Date: | 2001-08-31 10:02:40 |
Message-ID: | f2ouotkchf6tm7d9ndga5m35eo6nt8s3p0@4ax.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 Aug 2001 21:35:42 -0400, you wrote:
>"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> Are you sure? I thought all that autocommit meant was that a statement that
>> is not enclosed within a begin/commit is automatically committed after it is
>> run. So, in the this case all three queries will be independent, unless the
>> first statements is a 'begin;' and the last is a 'commit;'...
>
>What does the JDBC spec say about autocommit and ExecuteBatch()?
Not much, but that's a different story. We're still in the
process of figuring out how to implement this feature exactly.
That discussion is on the pgsql-jdbc list.
Regards,
René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-08-31 10:15:47 | Re: [OT] Re: User locks code |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-31 08:51:09 | Re: Multiple semicolon separated statements and autocommit |