| From: | Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_attribute size |
| Date: | 2009-10-26 22:51:47 |
| Message-ID: | f2fd819a0910261551w194f721dv24e392f46cbb4a9a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Agreed...
Thank you
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> We have several partitioned tables that get dropped every day ..We do
>> not do autovacuum as it is an IO hog (and most tables are dropped
>> anyways..and the large tables are never updated)..
>
> If you're not going to run autovacuum then that means *you* must take
> responsibility for vacuuming everything on a reasonable schedule.
> That includes the system catalogs. I think you'd be better off taking
> the effort to learn to tune autovacuum to fit your requirements.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Naomi Walker | 2009-10-26 22:57:41 | Re: pg_attribute size |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-26 22:46:43 | Re: pg_attribute size |