From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: insensitive collations |
Date: | 2019-01-25 15:19:41 |
Message-ID: | f2b3b8e8-12c4-ceb7-6803-b4af6eb2cb71@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16/01/2019 21:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16/01/2019 14:20, Daniel Verite wrote:
>> I've found another issue with aggregates over distinct:
>> the deduplication seems to ignore the collation.
>
> I have a fix for that. I'll send it with the next update.
Another patch. This fixes your issue, and it incorporates the findings
from the thread "ExecBuildGroupingEqual versus collations", as well as a
few other fixes and more tests.
As far as I can tell, this covers everything now, meaning all the
relevant plan types propagate the collation correctly and all the
relevant operators and functions do the right things with them.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Collations-with-nondeterministic-comparison.patch | text/plain | 137.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-25 15:30:39 | Re: Simplify set of flags used by MyXactFlags |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-25 15:19:21 | Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds |