Re: SET ROLE x NO RESET

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Michał Kłeczek <michal(at)kleczek(dot)org>, Eric Hanson <eric(at)aquameta(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET ROLE x NO RESET
Date: 2023-12-31 19:19:50
Message-ID: f261000a-f18d-40fd-aeee-0f5d548b4332@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/30/23 17:19, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
>
>> On 30 Dec 2023, at 17:16, Eric Hanson <eric(at)aquameta(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> What do you think of adding a NO RESET option to the SET ROLE command?
>
> What I proposed some time ago is SET ROLE … GUARDED BY ‘password’, so
> that you could later: RESET ROLE WITH ‘password'

I like that too, but see it as a separate feature. FWIW that is also
supported by the set_user extension referenced elsewhere on this thread.

--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-01-01 03:19:59 Re: Commitfest 2024-01 starting in 3 days!
Previous Message Joe Conway 2023-12-31 19:16:59 Re: Build versionless .so for Android