Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg
Date: 2017-06-07 03:32:53
Message-ID: f24345e8-4f7a-a4ac-69a9-68700a4872d7@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/6/17 13:52, Regina Obe wrote:
> It seems CREATE AGGREGATE was expanded in 9.6 to support parallelization of
> aggregate functions using transitions, with the addition of serialfunc and
> deserialfunc to the aggregate definitions.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-createaggregate.html
>
> I was looking at the PostgreSQL 10 source code for some example usages of
> this and was hoping that array_agg and string_agg would support the feature.

I'm not sure how you would parallelize these, since in most uses you
want to have a deterministic output order.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-06-07 03:41:15 Re: Fix tab-completion of ALTER SUBSCRIPTION SET PUBLICATION
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-06-07 02:58:24 Re: Why does logical replication launcher set application_name?