From: | "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | "Gregg Jaskiewicz" <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: oracle linux |
Date: | 2012-03-28 15:07:43 |
Message-ID: | f2216c4f64f42e611b7aeb1fe600d588.squirrel@sq.gransy.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 28 Březen 2012, 16:38, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote:
> They seem to claim up to 70% speed gain.
> Did anyone proved it, tested it - with PostgreSQL in particular ?
They do claim a lot of things, and most of the time it's along the lines
"Let's take this very specific case, let's assume these rather unusual
facts, let's run the benchmark on a slightly different hardware. And then
we'll choose the best of the results."
I've noticed that claim too (actually they claim 75%) and I've been
looking for the benchmark at
http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/performance-scalability/index.html but
no luck :-(
I really don't expect such difference just due to switching to a different
kernel. There's a space for infinite number of tweaks there (using a
different default fs parameters, adding better support for the new Niagara
T4 CPU not available to RedHat yet etc.).
> They seem to run the same way as RHEL do, ie - you can download it for
> free, but pay for repo access. (thus updates).
Well, and they can change that any time they want ...
Tomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | leaf_yxj | 2012-03-28 15:24:18 | what's difference between vacuum analyze and analyze? |
Previous Message | Gregg Jaskiewicz | 2012-03-28 14:38:38 | oracle linux |