| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: support for MERGE |
| Date: | 2021-01-10 15:36:49 |
| Message-ID: | f18aeb78-18fa-7f5e-1e50-2f1e96c6643a@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/10/21 2:44 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> 5) WHEN AND
>
> I admit the "WHEN AND" conditions sounds a bit cryptic - it took me a
> while to realize what this refers to. Is that a term established by SQL
> Standard, or something we invented?
The grammar gets it right but the error messages are nonsensical to me.
I would like to see all user-facing instances of "WHEN AND" be replaced
by the admittedly more verbose "WHEN [NOT] MATCHED AND".
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-01-10 16:54:48 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-01-10 14:51:16 | Re: Key management with tests |