From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Incremental backup |
Date: | 2021-10-28 18:00:08 |
Message-ID: | f16610db-9519-390f-1a56-1590d68b44ab@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/28/21 10:51, Ron wrote:
>>
>> Except we have no way of knowing what the situation is. I prefer not
>> to assume a context.
>
> You make it sound like incremental (and differential) backups are some
> complicated thing that needs context. That's utter and complete rubbish
> in every Enterprise RDBMS except Postgresql.
>
This is Postgres so we do need context.
Also you have not defined what you consider incremental backup? I for
one would put this:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/continuous-archiving.html
forward as a candidate.
> Something like "BACKUP DATABASE (DIFFERENTIAL) foo TO foo.bak;" should
> be a fundamental feature of every RDBMS that claims to be enterprise class.
Knock your self out:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron | 2021-10-28 18:48:19 | Re: Incremental backup |
Previous Message | Ron | 2021-10-28 17:51:51 | Re: Incremental backup |