From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Soref <jsoref(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SGML doc file references |
Date: | 2022-06-20 12:37:27 |
Message-ID: | f08585f2-6528-d743-1794-15acc5b51c72@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.06.22 21:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 17.06.22 19:52, Josh Soref wrote:
>>> ok, are they worth fixing?
>
>> That would require renaming either the output files or the input files,
>> and people would really not like either one.
>
> Agreed that renaming those files is not desirable, but the presented
> patch was only fixing erroneous/obsolete comments.
Yeah, I had totally misinterpreted what was being proposed. Of course,
the patch is most sensible. Committed.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dong Wook Lee | 2022-06-20 12:43:37 | Re: Add TAP test for auth_delay extension |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2022-06-20 11:57:29 | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |