Re: SGML doc file references

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Soref <jsoref(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SGML doc file references
Date: 2022-06-20 12:37:27
Message-ID: f08585f2-6528-d743-1794-15acc5b51c72@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17.06.22 21:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 17.06.22 19:52, Josh Soref wrote:
>>> ok, are they worth fixing?
>
>> That would require renaming either the output files or the input files,
>> and people would really not like either one.
>
> Agreed that renaming those files is not desirable, but the presented
> patch was only fixing erroneous/obsolete comments.

Yeah, I had totally misinterpreted what was being proposed. Of course,
the patch is most sensible. Committed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dong Wook Lee 2022-06-20 12:43:37 Re: Add TAP test for auth_delay extension
Previous Message vignesh C 2022-06-20 11:57:29 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup