Re: Is ssl_crl_file "SSL server cert revocation list"?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is ssl_crl_file "SSL server cert revocation list"?
Date: 2021-12-02 15:04:33
Message-ID: f084cce8-7703-dad6-e72c-dba76ecd6822@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02.12.21 10:42, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 2 Dec 2021, at 06:07, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> At Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:54:41 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
>>> As discussed in the thread [1], I find the wording "SSL server
>>> certificate revocation list" as misleading or plain wrong.
>>
>> FWIW, I'm convinced that that's plain wrong after finding some
>> occurances of "(SSL) client certificate" in the doc.
>
> I agree with this, the concepts have been a bit muddled.
>
> While in there I noticed that we omitted mentioning sslcrldir in a few cases.
> The attached v2 adds these and removes the whitespace changes from your patch
> for easier review.

This change looks correct to me.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-12-02 15:08:02 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Arne Roland 2021-12-02 14:58:28 Re: PATCH: generate fractional cheapest paths in generate_orderedappend_path