From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Storing blobs in PG DB |
Date: | 2007-04-05 21:43:11 |
Message-ID: | ev3qhf$nlh$1@sea.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Merlin Moncure wrote on 05.04.2007 23:24:
> I think most reasons why not to store binaries in the
> database boil down to performance.
Having implemented an application where the files were stored in the filesystem
instead of the database I have to say, with my experience I would store the
files in the DB the next time. Once the number of files in a directory exceeds a
certain limit, this directory is very hard to handle.
Things like "dir", or "ls" or listing the contents through a FTP connection
become extremely slow (using HP/UX as well as Windows).
And you have to backup only _one_ source (the database), not two. Moving the
data around from system a to system b (e.g. staging (windows) -> production
(HP/UX)) is a lot easier when you can simply backup and restore the database (in
our case it was an Oracle database, but this would be the same for PG)
Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-05 21:46:11 | Re: Seg fault in pg_dump? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-04-05 21:24:06 | Re: Storing blobs in PG DB |