Re: round(real,integer)

From: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: round(real,integer)
Date: 2014-01-10 23:12:54
Message-ID: etPan.52d07e76.3f2dba31.125ef@Butterfly.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

True (?) though I’m guessing the real test for most folks is if printf renders it as expected. Anything else if icing on the cake, no?

P

-- 
Paul Ramsey
http://cleverelephant.ca
http://postgis.net

On January 10, 2014 at 1:09:24 PM, Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:

to, say, 6 digits produces an exact 
decimal answer. Even if you're not exceeding 6 digits overall, it's 
unlikely that the answ

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-01-11 00:11:45 Re: pg_largeobject related issue with 9.2
Previous Message Day, David 2014-01-10 21:45:57 Re: pg_restore - selective restore use cases. HINT use DROP CASCADE