From: | teknokrat <teknokrat(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg on windows server 2003 64 bit edition |
Date: | 2007-02-12 18:20:54 |
Message-ID: | eqqb6b$2i3j$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Ted Byers wrote:
> I do not know about Windows server 2003, because I don't have it, but I
> DO have the 64 bit version of Windows XP pro (and it seems to be much
> more responsive that its 32 bit counterpart on the AMD Turion64 in my
> system), and Postgresql works fine on it. As for the amount of memory,
> I have only 2GB RAM, but that still works fine for me. Being 32 bit,
> postgesql will almost certainly not take direct advantage of more than 4
> GB of data, but if at least part of it works by spawning new threads or
> processes, use of more than 4 GB would be more a question of how the OS
> handles it, would it not? But if you don't need it to access more than 4
> GB of memory, you should have no problems running it.
>
> Unless Windows Server 2003 is radically different from XP, you should be
> fine based on what I have seen, at least if you use a binary
> distribution. I haven't tried compiling Postgresql myself, and I have
> not been able to get cygwin to install on 64 bit Windows. I would have
> thought cygwin programs would run like any other 32 bit app, but they
> don't. One of the things I look at is how 64 bit versions of an
> application behave relative to their 32 bit counterparts. I can do this
> with Perl (the 64 bit version from Activestate doesn't have any CPAN
> packages or even provide a way to find them, the CPAN executable runs
> but doesn't know about any archives, and when I tried pointing at 32 bit
> archives, the installation always failed), PHP, MS Visual studio and MS
> SQL Server, and MySQL. The bottom line is that the 32 bit Windows
> binary for Postgresql seems to work like any other 32 bit Windows
> application. But if you want it to directly use more than 4 GB memory,
> you probably need to build a 64 bit version yourself, with all the
> headaches that entails.
>
> HTH
>
> Ted
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "teknokrat" <teknokrat(at)yahoo(dot)com>
> To: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:04 AM
> Subject: [ADMIN] pg on windows server 2003 64 bit edition
>
>
>> Can anyone tell me if the win32 version of postgresql will install and
>> run on the 64 bit windows 2003 server? Will it work ok with ram > 4GB?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
ok, thanks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pedro noticioso | 2007-02-12 18:42:42 | WAL files backup |
Previous Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-12 18:08:27 | Re: Deadlock on transaction |