Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS

From: Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS
Date: 1999-11-09 13:15:30
Message-ID: emacs-smtp-589-14376-7794-234999@export.andrew.cmu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Then <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> spoke up and said:
> imho it will be extremely difficult to find an ORB which could be
> injected directly into the Postgres server. It would likely reduce the
> number of platforms Postgres runs on, and would not be considered
> acceptable.

On the other hand, this is where the power of configure comes into
play. Assuming we have servers for multiple ORBs, configure can look
to see what's installed (TAO, Orbit, whatever) and then build only
that server.

--
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-11-09 14:12:56 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-11-09 09:18:27 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-11-09 14:12:56 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS
Previous Message MESZAROS Attila 1999-11-09 13:13:37 jdbc 2.0 compilance (DatabaseMetaData)?