Re: releasing space

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Julie Nishimura <juliezain(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: releasing space
Date: 2019-10-19 23:34:32
Message-ID: eff5fb6b-7b6b-c33a-30a9-f7fd6976de11@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/19/19 4:17 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
> Thank you, Thomas. Do you know if it is safe to replicate 9.6.2
> (smaller) db to 9.6.15 (larger capacity) using pg_basebackup? Would it
> be considered as an upgrade?

pg_basebackup backups an entire Postgres cluster which will be many
databases. So when you say db do mean a Postgres cluster or an
individual database?

>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 19, 2019 5:44 AM
> *To:* Julie Nishimura <juliezain(at)hotmail(dot)com>
> *Cc:* pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
> <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; pgsql-general
> <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> *Subject:* Re: releasing space
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 05:20:09PM +0000, Julie Nishimura wrote:
>>Hello everybody, We are running PostgreSQL 9.6.2 cluster master ->
>>standby (streaming replication). 22 tb of space (constantly struggling
>>with the space, pruning the old data, but not fast enough). The biggest
>>db takes 16 tb. So, we've copied it to another server, and now we would
>>like to delete it from our original source, to free up the space. What
>>would be the right approach for this?  Just issue drop database command
>>(16tb). How long it might take? Should we do it gradually (drop biggest
>>tables first)? Any suggestions? Caveats?
>>
>
> Generally speaking, DROP DATABASE simply recursively drops all the
> various objects - indexes, tables, etc. It mostly just deleting the
> files, which should not be very expensive (we certainly don't need to
> delete all the data or anything), but there's certain number of I/O
> involved. But it does depend on the OS / filesystem / hardware if that's
> an issue.
>
> So if you want to be on the safe side, you can drop the objects one by
> one, with a bit of delay between them, to throttle the I/O a bit.
>
> FWIW the latest minor release for 9.6 is 9.6.15, you're 13 minor
> versions (~30 months) of fixes behind. You might want to consider
> upgrading ...
>
>
> --
> Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-10-19 23:53:34 Re: releasing space
Previous Message Julie Nishimura 2019-10-19 23:17:57 Re: releasing space